Back to Blog

Credible Challenge

By Finosec

April 7, 2022

Get notified on new insights from Finosec now!

Be the first to know about new Finosec blogs to grow your knowledge of the cybersecurity governance industry today!

It is understood and expected that auditors and examiners will ask financial institutions about the safeguards, controls, and tools in place that drive and strengthen their cybersecurity governance. But as FINOSEC President and CEO Zach Duke describes in today’s video, they will also be looking for additional components. The industry is seeing expectations to describe the nuances of what questions and processes were present in cyber related strategic decisions, a concept called “credible challenge.” Auditors and examiners are looking for validation that the Board and other executive leadership members are asking solid questions and demonstrate compelling processes in making decisions around cybersecurity. Watch the video from Zach below and come back after the break for further discussion.

The expectations of auditors and examiners continue to expand, and FINOSEC wants to provide you with the tools necessary to stay ahead of the curve. This concept of credible challenge is one we want you to be aware of as you continue to work within and guide the cybersecurity elements of your institution. It is simply a concept that illustrates how the financial institution’s leadership is seriously considering each decision before it is made, and that everything is fairly questioned. We understand that executive leadership will not necessarily be cybersecurity experts, so we want to help support you in that endeavor. FINOSEC provides educational deliverables, created and curated by our team of experts, to better equip you and your team for audits, exams, and a stronger cybersecurity posture. To join a community of like-minded individuals and to access educational content and more, sign up at FINOSEC Academy today.

More from Finosec

The Critical Link Between Third-Party Risk Management (TPRM) and Access Management

The Critical Link Between Third-Party Risk Management (TPRM) and Access Management

As highlighted in a recent article from the Federal Reserve, managing third-party relationships and the access associated with those relationships is a critical component of Third-Party Risk Management (TPRM). The associated access third party vendors have to banking systems is known as Access Management and is foundational for mitigating risks associated with third-party relationships. Access Management may be easy to overlook because it does not always reside with the same person or team as TPRM; making it difficult to provide critical oversight.

With increased regulatory focus, how should institutions be thinking of Access Management? Here are five steps your institution can take today to strengthen your third-party governance.

The Critical Foundation of Managing Access to Banking Systems

The Critical Foundation of Managing Access to Banking Systems

Managing access to banking systems has become increasingly complex as financial institutions navigate legacy reporting systems, API access, and cloud solutions. These challenges, along with the risks posed by unmanaged systems, emphasize the need for maintaining a...

Why You Need to Know Every System for Every Employee

Why You Need to Know Every System for Every Employee

Are you confident that your bank has clear and thorough visibility to every employee’s physical and digital access to systems? If you’re like most banks we work with, the answer to this question is “no”. There are many challenges that make tracking employee access...

Talk To An Expert Now
Talk To An Expert Now 770.268.2765