Back to Blog

FDIC and OCC Joint Statement on Cybersecurity Key takeaways – Part 1

By Finosec

May 25, 2021

Get notified on new insights from Finosec now!

Be the first to know about new Finosec blogs to grow your knowledge of the cybersecurity governance industry today!

The FDIC and OCC put out a joint statement on heightened cybersecurity risk concerns. This ‘heightened’ concern has bubbled up from the worries in the Middle East and Iran. In our nation’s history, oceans have been one of our primary defenses, but in today’s interconnected world, barriers for state-sponsored cyberattacks are removed. In the past several weeks, we have seen several updates from the Department of Homeland Security, FBI, and in this case, regulatory agencies.

As an industry, we tend to make technology over complicated and it is even worse in cybersecurity. Our mission at Finosec is to simplify information security and cybersecurity management in banking. The regulators highlighted three areas: Response and Resiliency, Authentication and Access Management, and Cyber Hygiene. I want to focus on the response and resiliency section today. The big takeaway is we have to change our mindset from if we get compromised to when. How does your team answer these questions?

  1. Do we have contact information for law enforcement (FBI, Secret Service, local)
  2. Does our cyber insurance contract include a breach coach? Do we have the contact information?
  3. Does our cyber insurance include resources for forensics? Have we defined what vendor we are going to use?
  4. When was our last incident response test? Were the right people included? When is our next test scheduled?
  5. Sheltered Harbor is referenced, does our core processor have a solution? Are we or should we be leveraging it?
  6. What’s the status of our backups? Is there any connectivity on our operational systems to our backups where they could be compromised in an attack?

If you have six minutes more, I recorded a video summary on the statement as well, which you can watch here: FDIC FIL Joint Statement

More from Finosec

The Critical Link Between Third-Party Risk Management (TPRM) and Access Management

The Critical Link Between Third-Party Risk Management (TPRM) and Access Management

As highlighted in a recent article from the Federal Reserve, managing third-party relationships and the access associated with those relationships is a critical component of Third-Party Risk Management (TPRM). The associated access third party vendors have to banking systems is known as Access Management and is foundational for mitigating risks associated with third-party relationships. Access Management may be easy to overlook because it does not always reside with the same person or team as TPRM; making it difficult to provide critical oversight.

With increased regulatory focus, how should institutions be thinking of Access Management? Here are five steps your institution can take today to strengthen your third-party governance.

The Critical Foundation of Managing Access to Banking Systems

The Critical Foundation of Managing Access to Banking Systems

Managing access to banking systems has become increasingly complex as financial institutions navigate legacy reporting systems, API access, and cloud solutions. These challenges, along with the risks posed by unmanaged systems, emphasize the need for maintaining a...

Why You Need to Know Every System for Every Employee

Why You Need to Know Every System for Every Employee

Are you confident that your bank has clear and thorough visibility to every employee’s physical and digital access to systems? If you’re like most banks we work with, the answer to this question is “no”. There are many challenges that make tracking employee access...

Talk To An Expert Now
Talk To An Expert Now 770.268.2765