Back to Blog

User Access Review Best Practices: Step 1 – Building the Foundation

By Finosec

January 5, 2023

Get notified on new insights from Finosec now!

Be the first to know about new Finosec blogs to grow your knowledge of the cybersecurity governance industry today!

User Access Best Practices Code TwoBlog

Let’s acknowledge a few things at the start.

  1. User access reviews (UAR) are important, and increasingly so.
  2. Examiners expect you to complete them regularly.
  3. They’re a crucial element of your overall cybersecurity program.
  4. They’re complicated and they take time.

Finosec team members have felt the pain of that last point, and set out to create a solution that would alleviate just that. We have developed a custom application with a tested and proven approach to the overall UAR process. We have completed over 11 million permission reviews, saving financial institutions time, effort, and money. We can come alongside you to help reduce the complexity of the process, save you time, and help you devote fewer resources to completing the task.

The Finosec process involves five steps for better user access reviews. These steps are an excellent way to simplify what can often be perceived as an overwhelmingly complex topic. We will spend this time reviewing the first step in utilizing this user access tool.

Step one: Create a system map

This is where you document the systems, functions, and processes you have in place. In a sense, you identify the “crown jewels” of your institution as well as who is responsible for each one. This information lays the foundation to help you perform better user access reviews. In a sense, it’s an organized overview of all the systems your institution utilizes to perform its necessary functions.

Inventory your software

This is the comprehensive overview of the applications your employees use. It includes a definition of the systems’ functions and their role in your institution. Be aware that you will almost always have more systems than you think you have, and completing this step will likely be a collaborative effort between the different departments in place at your institution.

Record the system locations

Are they in-house, or are they cloud-based? Or are they co-located in some form? Knowing where they are located is vital to manage their data and function.

Call out the systems where users are regularly added or removed

From a user access perspective, this is a crucial step. You must have visibility into where cybersecurity risk may increase because your user lists aren’t current.

Know what kind of API exists on the systems

This is another key aspect of your system map. Everywhere digital data flows creates a cybersecurity risk. When data integration with third parties occurs within your systems, you must be aware of it and document it.

Want more information?

This is just the first step on the journey toward simplified and improved user access reviews. We will spend more time in the coming weeks diving further into this tool and how it can improve what is currently an antiquated process which is reliant on legacy systems.

Join us on January 19th to review and discuss this 5-step process more in depth in our User Access Best Practices: 5 Steps to Enhance User Access Reviews webinar.

Or, if you’re frustrated because your institution still follows outdated processes to complete your user access reviews, you should contact Finosec today. We’d love to work alongside you to simplify your user access review process and make them easier than ever!

More from Finosec

Mastering Access Management: Best Practices for Effective User Access Reviews

Mastering Access Management: Best Practices for Effective User Access Reviews

Access management is a critical component of cybersecurity and compliance, especially for financial institutions where security expectations are paramount. The challenges surrounding permissions management, particularly during user access reviews, are increasing due to regulatory expectations and the complexity of banking applications. In this blog post, we’ll explore the regulatory expectations, common exam findings, and best practices that can help your organization manage user access effectively while adhering to the principle of least privilege – limiting user access to only the resources necessary to perform their job functions.

The Critical Link Between Third-Party Risk Management (TPRM) and Access Management

The Critical Link Between Third-Party Risk Management (TPRM) and Access Management

As highlighted in a recent article from the Federal Reserve, managing third-party relationships and the access associated with those relationships is a critical component of Third-Party Risk Management (TPRM). The associated access third party vendors have to banking systems is known as Access Management and is foundational for mitigating risks associated with third-party relationships. Access Management may be easy to overlook because it does not always reside with the same person or team as TPRM; making it difficult to provide critical oversight.

With increased regulatory focus, how should institutions be thinking of Access Management? Here are five steps your institution can take today to strengthen your third-party governance.

The Critical Foundation of Managing Access to Banking Systems

The Critical Foundation of Managing Access to Banking Systems

Managing access to banking systems has become increasingly complex as financial institutions navigate legacy reporting systems, API access, and cloud solutions. These challenges, along with the risks posed by unmanaged systems, emphasize the need for maintaining a...

Talk To An Expert Now
Talk To An Expert Now 770.268.2765