Back to Blog

Why Does Independence In Your Information Security Officer Matter?

By Finosec

May 19, 2022

Get notified on new insights from Finosec now!

Be the first to know about new Finosec blogs to grow your knowledge of the cybersecurity governance industry today!

ISO Independence

A vital component of your information security program is an information security officer that is independent and adhering to appropriate segregation of duties as outlined by regulatory expectations.

The FFIEC Information Security Handbook states: “Information security officers should report directly to the board or senior management and have sufficient authority, stature within the organization, knowledge, background, training, and independence to perform their assigned tasks. To ensure appropriate segregation of duties, the information security officers should be independent of the IT operations staff and should not report to IT operations management.” Obviously, the ISO should have knowledge and experience in these areas, but their authority and operations should be independent of the IT operations staff and management. This ensures that there is never any conflict of interest, and that the “responsibility for making changes and granting exceptions to policy [is] segregated from the enforcement of the controls.” However, in a smaller financial institution where staff wear multiple hats, this can be easier said than done.

Two Strategies

We often see two strategies when it comes to ensuring ISO independence at an institution.

  1. A team member who is intrinsically independent from IT staff is assigned the role of ISO. Therefore, it is often the case that this team member doesn’t have technology or cybersecurity expertise, resulting in a gap when it comes to implementing best practices. Also, this responsibility may very well fall to a senior level manager whose highest value activities for the institution as a whole are strategy and management, with time constraints naturally causing less emphasis to be placed on cybersecurity and information security practices.
  2. We also see the institution put processes in place to support and uphold the independence of the ISO with reporting and documentation, ensuring that independence is maintained and protected.

Tools and Support

Multiple FINOSEC team members were previously ISOs, and have felt the tension of maintaining that independence. Out of that tension and difficulty, they have created the Governance Automation Platform. This platform can help the ISO grow and simplify the steps for those who are still learning the ropes. Alternatively, even if the ISO is more seasoned and familiar with the difficulties, this platform can come alongside your institution and help you provide oversight reporting and documentation that empower you to master ISO independence as well as increase and validate your exam readiness.

Key Questions

Whether you are just getting started on this path or are reevaluating your effectiveness down the road, here are some key questions to ask:

  1. Is my ISO independent? Why or why not? How can we address this requirement?
  2. Do I have senior level staff members managing tasks in information security that are manual and time consuming? What tools or support do they need to address this?
  3. What reporting do we have to validate independence?

If you would like learn more about how FINOSEC can come alongside your institution to help increase and protect ISO independence, schedule a call by clicking the link below:

Schedule a Call

More from Finosec

Mastering Access Management: Best Practices for Effective User Access Reviews

Mastering Access Management: Best Practices for Effective User Access Reviews

Access management is a critical component of cybersecurity and compliance, especially for financial institutions where security expectations are paramount. The challenges surrounding permissions management, particularly during user access reviews, are increasing due to regulatory expectations and the complexity of banking applications. In this blog post, we’ll explore the regulatory expectations, common exam findings, and best practices that can help your organization manage user access effectively while adhering to the principle of least privilege – limiting user access to only the resources necessary to perform their job functions.

The Critical Link Between Third-Party Risk Management (TPRM) and Access Management

The Critical Link Between Third-Party Risk Management (TPRM) and Access Management

As highlighted in a recent article from the Federal Reserve, managing third-party relationships and the access associated with those relationships is a critical component of Third-Party Risk Management (TPRM). The associated access third party vendors have to banking systems is known as Access Management and is foundational for mitigating risks associated with third-party relationships. Access Management may be easy to overlook because it does not always reside with the same person or team as TPRM; making it difficult to provide critical oversight.

With increased regulatory focus, how should institutions be thinking of Access Management? Here are five steps your institution can take today to strengthen your third-party governance.

The Critical Foundation of Managing Access to Banking Systems

The Critical Foundation of Managing Access to Banking Systems

Managing access to banking systems has become increasingly complex as financial institutions navigate legacy reporting systems, API access, and cloud solutions. These challenges, along with the risks posed by unmanaged systems, emphasize the need for maintaining a...

Talk To An Expert Now
Talk To An Expert Now 770.268.2765